Legal Opinion

Alltone Co. v. Cebell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The Wisconsin statute of frauds applicable is as follows:

“Section 241.02 In the following case every agreement shall be void unless such agreement or some note or memorandum thereof, expressing the consideration, be in writing and subscribed by the party charged therewith: . . .
“(2) Every special promise to answer for the debt . . . of another person.”

Upon the question of what amounts to an expression of the consideration under this statute there is some confusion in this state. International Textbook Co. v. McKone, 133 Wis. 200, 113 N. W. 438. The guaranty attached to the contract there…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eastman v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Commercial National Bank of Appleton v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Taylor v. PrattWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Coxe Bros. & Co. v. MilbrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Young v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. M. J. Wallrich Land & Lumber Co. v. EbenreiterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Jacobi v. CielinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. Clark Climate Control Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947
  4. Monark Metal & Supply Co. v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API