Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Folsom v. Folsom

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 17, 1874Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of Ladd, J.

1Concurrence

Upon the principles laid down in the authorities, this application must be denied. Adams v. Adams, 51 N.H. 397; Greene v. Greene, 2 Gray 361; Edson v. Edson, 108 Mass. 598. In Greene v. Greene it was decided that a decree of divorce cannot be called in question or invalidated, on the ground of fraud in its procurement, in a separate and independent libel subsequently brought between the same parties, when it appears that the first decree was entered after due notice to the adverse party, followed by an adjudication upon evidence offered in support of the allegations in the libel.

In Edson v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1872
  2. Tebbetts v. TiltonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API