Legal Opinion

Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bain

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 19, 1942No. 6 Div. 987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action ‘on an accident policy of insurance whereby defendant agreed to pay plaintiff the stipulated monthly sum of $75 if he should through accidental means sustain bodily injuries, “which shall wholly and continuously disable insured for one day or more, and so long as the insured lives and suffers said total loss of time,” and the sum of $30 monthly “if such injuries * * * shall wholly and continuously disable the insured from performing one or more important duties.”

Plaintiff is here suing for the $75 monthly, claiming that he suffered such an injury which caused…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. DanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Schroder.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. AlstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Wilkey v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Dullum v. Northern Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API