Francis v. Administrators of Lathrope
Supreme Court of Vermont
THIS was an appeal from the report of commissioners upon an insolvent estate. 1 he appellant entered the certified copies from the registry of probate, but had omitted to file a declaration, although the nature of his claim might be understood from the certified record.
Read the full summary
THIS was an appeal from the report of commissioners upon an insolvent estate. 1 he appellant entered the certified copies from the registry of probate, but had omitted to file a declaration, although the nature of his claim might be understood from the certified record. The statute provides, “ That if any creditor shall exhibit his claim or demand against any such estate so represented insolvent as aforesaid, to the commissioners as before mentioned, and the said commissioners shall disallow it wholly or in part; such creditor, conceiving himself aggrieved by the judgment and determination of…
1Opinion of the Court
And now on motion, the Court allowed the appellant a day to file his declaration with the Clerk of the Court, under a rule that he should pay the administrators their costs, and tax no costs at this term, in case he eventually prevailed in the suit, and that he should at a day prescribed, serve the administrators with a copy of his declaration.
Cause continued.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Maughan v. Estate of BurnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Thorp v. Thorp's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- In Re Partridge's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Cutting v. Estate of EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.