Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Ruckelshaus
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 8, 1973No. Civ. A. 2466-72PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GASCH, District Judge.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment and mandamus to compel the defendant, William D. Ruckelshaus, until recently Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“the Administrator”) to comply with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 816 (hereafter termed “the Act”) . 1 Plaintiff is the City of New York, suing on behalf of itself and all similarly situated municipalities within the State of New York. The City of Detroit has been granted leave to intervene as a party plaintiff seeking the same relief. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Train v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of New York v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Guadamuz v. AshDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Campaign Clean Water, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.