Legal Opinion

Shade v. Hartman

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided October 15, 1901No. 58Published

Summons — Attachment Under Act oe May 8, 1876, P. L. 139 — Board—Wages—Certiorari. No. 58, October Term, 1901; C. P. of Lancaster county.

1Opinion of the CourtLandis, J.

On Sept. 10, 1901, suit was brought before a Justice of the Peace by the plaintiff against Walter F. Hartman to recover a board bill claimed by her to be then due, and on Sept. 20, 1901, judgment was entered by the Justice in her favor, by default, for $12.00 against Walter F. Hartman, as defendant, and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, as garnishee. The claim, as made, was for four weeks’ board at $3 per week, and the affidavit filed at the inception of the suit makes no mention'of a garnishee, and the summons is against Hartman alone. Thereupon, on October 9, 1901, this certiorari was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weisman v. Weisman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API