Legal Opinion

Snelson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided November 10, 2010No. 07-10-0259-CVPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On March 9, 2005, Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver in a drug-free zone, enhanced, and sentenced to sixty years confinement. Although the judgment of conviction recited “that the State of Texas do have and recover of the said defendant all costs in this proceeding incurred,” the summary portion of the judgment left blank the amount of those costs. That judgment became final and mandate issued on October 5, 2007.

More than two years later, using the same cause number, the trial court signed and entered an Order to Withdraw Inmate Funds…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mayer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Harrell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Johnson v. Tenth Judicial District Court of Appeals at WacoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Iacono v. Lyons, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by42 opinions

  1. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  2. Owen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  3. In Re Hart, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  4. Maldonado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  5. Snelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API