Legal Opinion

Putnam, Hooker & Co. v. Loeb & Schoenfeld

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided January 15, 1887Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County.

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse an order made by the court of common pleas in the distribution of a fund betwéen the plaintiffs in error and the defendants in error, who are creditors attaching certain goods.

The record shows that on April 15,1884; the plaintiffs in error brought suit against one George W. Clay, upon an account for goods sold and delivered to him, as averred in the petition, at his request, “ by the description of G. W. Clay & Bro.”

*111The petition then averring that no part of the account is due, proceeds as follows: “The defendant G. W. Clay has sold, conveyed, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stage v. OldsOhio Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Constable & Co. v. WhiteOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API