Legal Opinion

People v. Heyward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the information supporting the search warrant was stale merely because it was acquired 12 and 13 days before the issuance of the warrant (see, People v Bryan, 191 AD2d 1029; People v Clarke, 173 AD2d 550). The search warrant application provided the issuing Magistrate with information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence of illegal drug activity would be present at the time and place of the search (see, People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417; 423; People v Bryan, supra; People v St. Louis, 177 AD2d 882,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. BryanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. St. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GrecoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Town of East Hampton v. Omabuild USA No. 1, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API