Legal Opinion

Glass-Pendery Consolidated Mining Co. v. Meyer Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Lake County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, O. J.

The two mining companies which constitute the parties, appellant and appellee, to this appeal, were, in the month of December, A. D. 1880, the respective owners of adjoining mining claims in Lake county. The appellee, being the owner of the .¿Etna mine, complained that the appellant company had, by its agents and servants, crossed the boundary line and committed various trespasses upon its property, including the running of divers drifts, levels and other developments,, and the extraction of valuable ores and mineral-bearing substances. It was finally agreed to submit the whole…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pettibone v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
  2. Tucker v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. Woodrow v. O'ConnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  4. Akridge v. PatilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  5. Browning v. WheelerNew York Supreme Court · 1840

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mills v. Board of Conciliation & ArbitrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Smith v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Arbitration between T.A.H. General Partnership v. Southwest RadiographicsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Harper Hofer & Assocs., LLC v. Nw. Direct Mktg., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Smith v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API