Legal Opinion

Miller v. Stebbins

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 26, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit on a promissory note. Pleas, the general issue, with notice denying the signature; and the Statute of Limitations. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1904, Orleans County, Haselton, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion fully states the case. The evidence offered as to the poverty of Crawford and Inis family should have been admitted.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit on a promissory note. Pleas, the general issue, with notice denying the signature; and the Statute of Limitations. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1904, Orleans County, Haselton, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion fully states the case. The evidence offered as to the poverty of Crawford and Inis family should have been admitted. Strong v. Slicer, 35 Vt. 40; Randall v. Preston, 52 Vt. 108; McDowell v. McDowell’s Rst., 75 Vt. 404; Downer v. Bowen, 12 Vt. 452; Kimball v. Locke, 31 Vt. 683. Crawford could not have collected the…

1Opinion of the CourtStart, J.

The action is for the recovery of the amount claimed toi be due upon a promissory note for the sum of two hundred dollars, dated October 15, 1896, payable to; A. J. Crawford, or bearer, on demand, and purporting to be signed by the defendant. The evidence of the plaintiif tended to show that the note was given for two hundred dollars loaned by Crawford to the defendant on the day the note purports to have been executed; that the defendant executed and .delivered the note to Crawford on that day, and he held it until the spring or summer of 1897, when he turned it out to one Ceorge Miller as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thrall v. NewellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  2. Bates v. SabinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  3. Hannum v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
  4. Gilchrist v. HilliardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
  5. Labaree v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fish v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Schagrin v. SchagrinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API