Legal Opinion
Meers v. Munsch-Protzmann Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1926PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.
The defendant conducts a drugstore at the northwest corner of Vanderbilt avenue and Forty-sixth street, New York city. On or about August 29, 1923, a written agreement was entered into between plaintiffs and defendant as follows:
“ Permission is hereby given to Messrs. James F. Meers and Justin C. O’Brien or any corporation which they may organize to operate a soda fountain in our store at 46th Street and Vanderbilt Avenue, New York City, for the purpose of selling soda, ice cream, sundaes, sandwiches, cake, pastry and soft drinks.
“ Meers and O’Brien or the corporation shall have the privilege…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Wiseman v. . LucksingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Greenwood Lake & Port Jervis Railroad v. New York & Greenwood Lake RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Lanman v. CrookerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Bagg v. RobinsonThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Barnett v. LincolnWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Statement, Inc. v. Pilgrim's Landing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- National Candy Wholesalers, Inc. v. Chipurnoi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.