Legal Opinion

In re Wiegand

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1902Published

Application for a peremptory writ of mandamus..

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

The relator seeks by mandamus reinstatement to the position of cashier in the office of the commissioner of public works. Both at the time of his appointment and removal his position was classified in the noncompetitive list and ranked as confidential. He was removed without any charges being preferred or hearing had and his application is based upon the contention that this was in violation of section 1543 of the Greater New York charter as amended, chapter 466, Laws of 1901. While the classification by the civil service commission is not controlling, it indicates the conclusion reached by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re OstranderNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Matter of Shaughnessy v. . FornesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Shaughnessy v. FornesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API