People v. Billingsley
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
There was no deficiency in the court’s inquiry of defendant or in defendant’s responses on the occasion of the acceptance of his plea of guilty. Reference was then included to the defendant’s claim that the gun was fired in self-defense. Defendant’s postplea assertion of innocence predicated on the theory of self-defense in no way vitiated the validity of his prior, counseled plea of guilty. There was, therefore, no abuse of discretion in the denial of defendant’s postsentencing motion to withdraw his plea.
We…
2Cited by24 opinions
- People v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RiosNew York Court of Appeals · 2026
- People v. BraunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. LatimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.