Legal Opinion

Divella v. Divella

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 23, 1993No. 93-594Published

1Per curiam

The appellees, Roger Divella and Diana Hoffman, failed to overcome the presumption of undue influence. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971). As a result, the account transfer which was procured by the appellees is null and void. Gorman v. Harrison, 559 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

The trial court correctly ordered each party to pay their own attorney’s fees. The petition filed by Roger Divella and Diana Hoffman was not a claim against Robert Divella, as the personal representative of the estate. The litigation was in no way for the benefit of the estate. Rather it was a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Gorman v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API