Legal Opinion

State v. Riedel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 25, 1988No. 60,668PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by:

Holmes, J.:

The State of Kansas appeals from an order of the district court dismissing the complaint against the defendant Lanny Riedel. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion in limine and ruled that the State was barred from introducing evidence of the facts underlying a prior conviction which had been expunged pursuant to K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-4619. The State then refused to go to trial and the complaint was dismissed. The State appeals.

As defendant has made no appearance in this appeal, the facts must be gleaned solely from the rather sparse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. QuickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Brown v. HardinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. State v. OwenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. State v. AldrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API