Copeland v. West American Insurance

RAWLS, Judge.

We are here concerned with the theft coverage of a casualty automobile insurance policy. Summary final judgment was entered by the trial judge in favor of Appellee insurance company, hence this appeal. Appellant’s points on appeal amount to one question: Did the trial judge err in entering a summary judgment upon the evi-dentiary material submitted? We conclude that he did; material issues of fact have been controverted, and, therefore, we reverse.

Appellant Copeland, who lived in Orlando, in 1961 purchased a 1961 Pontiac automobile and financed the major portion of the purchase…