Legal Opinion

Sautter v. Supreme Conclave Improved Order of Heptasophs

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court-

1Opinion of the Court

*609The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mague, Chancellor.

We find it impossible to consider the questions presented by the elaborate briefs of counsel, for the writ of error in this case discloses no final judgment in the court below.

The declaration is upon a benefit certificate in favor of a beneficiary therein named. It would seem, from the state of the case, that the pleas once filed to the declaration were, with consent of counsel, withdrawn from the files, and two pleas were substituted. . One of those pleas was the general .issue. The other was a special plea in bar. To the latter plea…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney-General ex rel. Pierson v. CadySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Chambers v. Philadelphia Pickling Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Warren Balderston Co. v. IvorySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API