Dickenson v. Regent of Albuquerque, Ltd.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals the jury’s award of damages and the trial court’s denial of his motion for additur or a new trial. Defendants cross-appeal the trial court’s award of costs. Our calendar notice proposed summary affirmance of plaintiff’s appeal and summary reversal of defendants’ appeal. Both parties have filed memoranda in support and in opposition respectively to our proposed disposition. In addition, defendants filed a motion for leave to reply to plaintiff’s response to the calendar notice. Our appellate rules do not permit the filing of such replies. Landavazo v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strickland v. Roosevelt County Rural Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Phillips v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Benavidez v. BenavidezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Landavazo v. New Mexico Department of Human ServicesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Albios v. Horizon Communities, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Pope v. Gap, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Gonzales v. New Mexico Board of Chiropractic ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Dunleavy v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.