Larsen v. Carlene Langford & Associates, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRAY, Justice.
This case involves “as is” language found in documents utilized in a real estate transaction involving the sale of an historic home. David and Patricia Larsen, purchasers of the home, appeal the summary judgment granted to Carlene Langford & Associates, Inc. Because we conclude the “as is” language conclusively negates the element of causation that is essential for each of the Larsens’ claims, we affirm the judgment.
Factual & Procedural History
In 1996, David and Patricia Larsen began searching for real estate outside the Dallas area. David, a real estate licensee, had…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Green International, Inc. v. SolisTexas Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Robbins v. Capozzi, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
- Woodhaven Partners, LTD v. Shamoun & Norman, LLP F/K/A Shoumoun Klatsky Norman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Richter v. Wagner Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Owens v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
- Gill v. Boyd Distribution Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.