Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Carlene Langford & Associates, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided March 7, 2001No. 10-99-122-CVPublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRAY, Justice.

This case involves “as is” language found in documents utilized in a real estate transaction involving the sale of an historic home. David and Patricia Larsen, purchasers of the home, appeal the summary judgment granted to Carlene Langford & Associates, Inc. Because we conclude the “as is” language conclusively negates the element of causation that is essential for each of the Larsens’ claims, we affirm the judgment.

Factual & Procedural History

In 1996, David and Patricia Larsen began searching for real estate outside the Dallas area. David, a real estate licensee, had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Green International, Inc. v. SolisTexas Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Capozzi, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
  2. Woodhaven Partners, LTD v. Shamoun & Norman, LLP F/K/A Shoumoun Klatsky Norman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  3. Richter v. Wagner Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. Owens v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
  5. Gill v. Boyd Distribution Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API