Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Arlington

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 8, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is an action of tort, brought by the plaintiff, as executor of the will of Charles Harrington, to recover damages for injury done to the testator’s land by flowing the same, in the summer of 1872; and the question presented for our consideration is, whether the entry upon the land was a lawful entry for the purpose of supplying the town of Arlington with water, as authorized by the Legislature, and to be compensated for under the provisions of the acts authorizing the entry; or whether the entry was tortious, damages for which are recoverable in this action.

It appears by the bill of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gloucester Water Supply Co. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Peabody v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Whiting v. Malden & Melrose RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Bassett v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Lexington Print Works v. Inhabitants of CantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API