Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. James T. Schell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1982No. 80-2255, 80-2256Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcKAY, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority’s conclusion that sentencing under the “dangerous special offender” provisions of the Organized Crime Control Act requires procedural protections beyond those provided in normal sentencing. However, I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the “preponderance of the information” sentencing standard specified by these provisions is sufficient to protect the defendant’s due process rights.

I

Section 3575 of the Organized Crime Control Act provides criminal sentences, beyond those specified in the crime charged, for convicted defendants who are identified as “dangerous…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API