United States v. James T. Schell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcKAY, Circuit Judge
I concur in the majority’s conclusion that sentencing under the “dangerous special offender” provisions of the Organized Crime Control Act requires procedural protections beyond those provided in normal sentencing. However, I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the “preponderance of the information” sentencing standard specified by these provisions is sufficient to protect the defendant’s due process rights.
I
Section 3575 of the Organized Crime Control Act provides criminal sentences, beyond those specified in the crime charged, for convicted defendants who are identified as “dangerous…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.