Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 24, 1967No. 5605PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following resolution was adopted by the Governor and Council February 10, 1967 and filed in this court on February 13, 1967:

“ Whereas, An applicant for a commission as a notary public and for a commission as a justice of the peace has declined to sign the oath required by the subversive activities act ( RSA 588 ) solely because he challenges the constitutionality of the oath; and
“ Whereas, The Secretary of State has submitted the applications for the commissions to the Governor and Executive Council without the oath required by RSA 588:10, 15; and
“ Whereas, The Governor and Executive…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Aptheker v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vogel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Thalberg v. Board of Trustees of the UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  3. Vogel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API