Kenneth Lee Baker Steven Robert Baker, Melissa Thomas v. General Motors Corporation, in Re: General Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentHeaney, Circuit Judge
By allowing a litigant to assert privilege to suppress contradictory evidence, today’s opinion gives a litigant free rein to make assertions contradicted by the litigant’s own documentary evidence without being branded as untruthful. The district court correctly held that this is an abuse of evidentiary privilege because it permits a party to adhere to what appears to be an unequivocal position when contradictory evidence is available but inadmissible. I find fault with the majority’s legal reasoning and with the policy implications of its opinion. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings. Frank J. Duffy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Rosser v. Standard Milling CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Sappington v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Charles Woods Television Corp. v. Capital Cities/abc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.