Legal Opinion · Dissent

The State of Texas v. Daniel Grundstrom

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1968No. 25423Published

1DissentThornberry, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) :

Invoking our power under 28 U.S.C. § 2243 to dispose of habeas corpus petitions “as law and justice require,” I would dismiss the State’s appeal with the proviso that if Grundstrom be retried it be on the original charge, that he not be subject to any sentence greater than that first imposed, and that he be given credit for time served under the 1962 conviction. I must respectfully dissent from this Court’s' dismissal of the appeal without qualification.

The argument that we should pretermit discussion of the constitutional issue and leave its initial resolution to state courts…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API