In re Pistone

OPINION OF THE COURT

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on December 21,1960.

In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the respondent was charged with (1) engaging in an impermissible conflict of interest; (2) neglecting three legal matters entrusted to him; and (3) engaging in conduct involving fraud, deceit and misrepresentation in two of those matters. The Referee found that all of the charges were sustained.

*117The petitioner has moved to confirm the report of the Referee and the respondent has cross-moved to disaffirm said report.

After reviewing all…