Legal Opinion
Santora v. Red Clay Consolidated School District
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 26, 2012No. CA 09-513-RGAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANDREWS, District Judge.
This is a motion for summary judgment. (D.I. 99). Plaintiffs remaining claims are for procedural due process violations and workers’ compensation retaliation. The procedural due process claim is against Defendants Red Clay Consolidated School District and Debra Davenport. The workers’ compensation retaliation claim is against Red Clay alone.1 Defendants move for summary judgment on both of these claims.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff began her employment with Red Clay on November 10, 2003 as a secretary. (D.I. 1, ¶ 10). She filed two workers’ compensation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Moore v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gilliss v. Dentsply, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Cameron J. Williams v. Walmart, Inc. and Sam's West Inc. d/b/a Sam’s ClubDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Jewel Redic v. Interfaith Community Housing of Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2026
- Thompson v. FernbachSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
- Weller v. Morris James LLPSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.