Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Citizens & Southern National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1953No. 18210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Whether the assessment here is against the bank or against its shareholders, the bank is entitled to maintain a suit in equity in its own name to prevent an unlawful assessment. Pelton v. National Bank, 101 U. S. 143 (25 L. ed. 901); Hills v. Exchange Bank, 105 U. S. 319 (26 L. ed. 1052). Since a national bank is an instrumentality of the Federal government, the States are without power to tax such banks in the absence of consent of the Congress. Owensboro National Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 664 (19 Sup. Ct. 537, 43 L. ed. 850). Such congressional consent is given…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Owensboro National Bank v. OwensboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Pelton v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Burnet v. Willingham Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Mayor v. HartridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  5. Hills v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fulton County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Fulton County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Fulton County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API