Iwaniszek v. Pride Transport, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 Stephen J. Iwaniszek, Case No. 2:17-cv-02918-JCM-BNW 5 Plaintiff, 6 ORDER v. 7 Pride Transport, Inc., 8 Defendant. 9 10 11 Before the Court is plaintiff Stephen J. Iwaniszek’s application for leave to proceed in 12 forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 21. Iwaniszek submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. 13 § 1915(a) showing an inability to prepay fees or costs or give security for them. Therefore, 14 Iwaniszek’s request to proceed IFP will be granted. 15 Further, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court screened…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.