Legal Opinion

State v. Piehl

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 23, 1966No. 34454PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALDWELL, Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District,1 asserted to be in conflict with State v. O’Neal, 174 So.2d 564, 565 (Fla.App.2d 1965), Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Baynard, 112 Fla. 544, 151 So. 5 (1933) and Jones v. State, 44 Fla. 74, 32 So. 793, 794 (Fla.1902).

Respondent pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, assault with intent to commit murder. Subsequently, on November 9, 1963, respondent filed an “amended motion” to vacate sentence and judgment in the Circuit Court. The motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  2. Piehl v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. BaynardSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. State v. O'NealDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCrae v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Nova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. MacHwart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Slattery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API