Stackpole v. Hancock
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. -Statement. The amended bill, filed by appellees W. f. „ tack-pole, James Connor, Rosanna Connor, Eugene Connor and wife Johanna, and W. J. Connor, against W. S. Hancock, John J. Hale, John M. Taylor and C. C. Keathley, and George T. Ross, alleges that complainants were on and before the 1st day of June, 1890, seized in fee and possessed by the W. 1-2 of S. W. 1-4 of,Sec. 12 Tp. 22 S., R. 20 E., situated in Hernando county,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. -Statement. The amended bill, filed by appellees W. f. „ tack-pole, James Connor, Rosanna Connor, Eugene Connor and wife Johanna, and W. J. Connor, against W. S. Hancock, John J. Hale, John M. Taylor and C. C. Keathley, and George T. Ross, alleges that complainants were on and before the 1st day of June, 1890, seized in fee and possessed by the W. 1-2 of S. W. 1-4 of,Sec. 12 Tp. 22 S., R. 20 E., situated in Hernando county, the said W. P. Stackpole being the owner of an undivided half interest in said land and the other complainants being the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
Both complainants and defendants entered appeals in this case, and separate transcripts of the record have been filed on the appeals. No objection is urged to any of the appellate proceedings in this court, nor is any objection made to the procedure in the Circuit Court, except a suggestion in brief of counsel for Hancock and others that the record fails to show a disposition of the plea filed by George T. Ross and set down for argument. Ross was made a party to the bill but no reliefwas, specially prayed against him, nor does the decree appealed from expressly adjudicate anything…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Laidlaw v. OrganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Williams v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Smith v. . CountrymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Sams v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Kohl v. LindleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Pinney v. PinneySupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Nessim v. DeLoacheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Hirschman v. Hodges, O'Hara & Russell Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Durham v. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.