Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Barr

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 1938No. 14653PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburnr.

This action involves a construction of the will of W. J. P. Kinard, late of the County of Lexington, who died testate on or about March 1, 1919. The controversy has to do with the nature and extent of the interest and estate which the testator devised to his wife, Mattie J. Kinard, who survived him. The respondent contends that the widow received a life estate only. The appellant contends that if under the will she did not take an estate in fee, she took a life interest, with full power of disposal during her lifetime, and- that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. MiddlesworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Ford v. TicknorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Young v. HillierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  4. Dye v. Beaver Creek ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. Paxton v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dabney v. EstesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  2. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. RoachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Harrell v. GradyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Stanton v. DavidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API