Legal Opinion

United States v. Windom

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2017No. 16-1027PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Samuel Terraye Windom entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Mr. Windom now appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the firearm, arguing that officers obtained the firearm as part of an unconstitutional seizure. More specifically, Mr. Windom takes the position that officers used unreasonable “high-risk” traffic stop procedures to investigate a “completed misdemeanor”—that is, Mr. Windom’s flashing of a firearm in public—and submits that…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. MayvilleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. DeAndre JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. RonquilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  5. Bailey v. FranklinDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API