Legal Opinion
Walhood v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided February 16, 1995No. 1:93CV938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCHELL, Chief Judge.
CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION the above-styled and numbered civil action, the court having heretofore ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge at Beaumont, Texas, for proper consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court; and the court having received and considered the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence, it is found that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Benito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- David M. Baker v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Jernigan v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020