Legal Opinion
American Oak Leather Co. v. C. H. Fargo & Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided November 30, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Newman, Northrup & Levinson and Smith, EJelmer, Moulton & Price, for unsecured creditors.
1Opinion of the Court
GROSSCUP, District Judge.
The motion under consideration is for a receiver for the funds now in the hands of the marshal, resulting from a judicial sale of the effects of C. H. Fargo & Co., a corporation under the laws of Illinois, and for the book accounts and other assets assigned by the corporation. The funds realized from the sale and assignments are not more than sufficient to meet the judgments obtained by L. Candee & Co., the Metropolitan National Bank, and the United States Rubber Company, — judgments obtained upon notes confessedly made in preference to the other creditors of C. H.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Robinson v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce in Denver v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- United States Rubber Co. v. American Oak Leather Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897