Legal Opinion

People v. Armstrong

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1973No. 45325PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

This case is concerned with the effect of orders denying or sustaining motions to suppress evidence upon the ground that it was illegally obtained. Section 114 — 12(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that if a motion to suppress is granted, “the property shall be restored *** and it shall not be admissible in evidence against the movant at any trial; ***.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, par. 114—12(b).) Because he considered himself bound by this statute to do so, the Honorable Robert J. Downing granted the defendant’s motion to suppress in the present case. The State appealed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HopkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. The PEOPLE v. Armstrong (Sumlin)Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. ArmstrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. GilliamIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. GraysonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API