Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cuevas v. Garcia

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1984No. 04-83-00088-CVPublished

1DissentTijerina, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The movant for summary judgment has the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wilcox v. St. Mary’s University of San Antonio, 531 S.W.2d 589, 592-93 (Tex.1975); TEX.R. CIV.P. 166-A. In deciding whether or not there is a disputed material fact issue precluding summary judgment, “every reasonable inference must be indulged in favor of the non-movant and any doubt resolved in their favor.” Id. at 593.

There is no dispute that appellants as the children of Maria Guadalupe Cuevas, deceased…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Welder v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Dixon v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. White v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Beeman v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API