Legal Opinion

Richmond County v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1964No. 40626PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

Defendant urges as reasons why the trial court should have sustained its general demurrer, (a) that it appears from the petition that no part of their property has been taken in the construction of the highway, (b) that it appears from the allegations of the petition that plaintiffs’ property does not abut or touch the highway at any point, but is 50 feet distant therefrom, and that there is no allegation that their right of ingress and egress has been interfered with to any extent whatever, (c) that since it is alleged that the highway was constructed “by the State Highway…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Smith v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Tift County v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Tounsel v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwindleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Department of Transportation v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Georgia Power Co. v. BraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. DeKalb County v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Woodside v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API