Legal Opinion

C.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 16, 2001No. 2D99-3715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

C.J., the petitioner, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the State to offer him a “Walker Plan” as outlined in Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.075.1 The State offered a pretrial diversion plan to C.J. that took into account other provisions of rule 8.075, such as the requirement that the plan contain a stipulation that the speedy trial rule is waived, but it did not track the rule in all respects.

C.J. requests this court to order the State to remove some of the additional requirements from the offered plan. Specifically, the plan offered by the State would require C.J. to agree that if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Puckett v. GentryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Fairweather v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Turner v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Media General Convergence, Inc. v. Chief Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial CircuitDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. CJ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. L.D.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API