Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. Wilson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 30, 1965No. 65-143Published

1DissentTillman Pearson, Judge

My dissent is upon the application of the law stated in the majority opinion. The fundamental purpose for the summary judgment procedure is to relieve the litigant and the court from the trial of baseless lawsuits. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Patty, Fla.1959, 109 So.2d 5; General Truck Sales, Inc. v. American Fire & Casualty Company, Fla.App.1958, 100 So.2d 202. By expediting the disposition of such claims, the summary judgment procedure saves valuable trial time and thus assists in securing speedy and inexpensive justice. Cook v. Navy Point, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 532. The principle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. PattySupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Cook v. Navy Point, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. General Truck Sales, Inc. v. American Fire & Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. Rodriguez v. HallerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API