In Re Neal
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY, District Judge.
Peay’s Detective Agency failed to pay over withholding taxes to the United States for eight quarters between 1982 and 1985. The United States assessed the full delinquent amount against Denise Neal. See 26 U.S.C. § 6672(a). 1 Neal, who was in bankruptcy, petitioned the bankruptcy court to determine the extent of her liability. See 11 U.S.C. § 505 (bankruptcy court empowered to determine debtor’s tax liabilities). The bankruptcy court conducted an evidentiary hearing and determined that Neal became responsible, for § 6672(a) purposes, in April, 1984. It concluded…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of Daniel J. YONIKUS and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YONIKUSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Alfred M. Sinder, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant, and Angelo Ventrone, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- The Purdy Company of Illinois, an Illinois Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Marlow P. RunningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Martin v. Bay State Milling Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.