Legal Opinion

Pekin Insurance v. Adams

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 2002No. 4—01—1056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Appleton

Amanda Adams owned a Doberman pinscher, which bit a seven-year-old boy, Christopher Marshall. Amanda had renter’s liability insurance from Pekin Insurance Co. (Pekin), and Christopher’s father, Nicholas Marshall, submitted a claim. Pekin denied the claim and filed a complaint for rescission of the insurance policy on the ground that Amanda had falsely stated, in her application for the insurance, that she had no “animals.” The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted Pekin’s motion and denied defendants’ motions.

Nicholas appeals the summary judgment in Pekin’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Royal Neighbors of America v. BomanIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Logan v. Allstate Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Beck v. Capitol Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Marionjoy Rehabilitation Hospital v. LoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Fitt v. City of MattoonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pekin Insurance v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Pekin Insurance Co. v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Pekin Insurance v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API