Legal Opinion

O'Malley v. Carrick

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1930No. Docket No. 7146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

In this action the trial court made an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without' leave to amend, and from the judgment entered in favor of defendants pursuant to such order the plaintiff appeals.

In the first paragraph of the complaint it was alleged that James R. Garrick died intestate on January 9, 1923; that on February 8, 1923, one of the defendants above named was appointed administratrix of his estate, and that both defendants were his only heirs at law, and as such succeeded to his estate. In the second and concluding paragraph of the complaint it was alleged that “at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Leonis v. LeffingwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Meyer v. O'RourkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Stevens v. San Francisco & North Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. SandbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Gonsalves v. Petaluma Building Materials Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. South v. WishardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API