Legal Opinion

Monitor Iron Works Co. v. Ketchum

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Brown County.

1Opinion of the CourtLyon, J.

A former decision of this cause was inadvertently reported in 44 Wis., 126, after a rearguraent had been ordered. The statement of the case there made will not be repeated.

The circuit court referred the cause to a referee to hear, try and determine. The reference was compulsory, and the question of its regularity, or the power of the court to mate it, was not raised on the former argument. The reárgument was granted mainly upon that question.

If the trial of any issue of fact in the cause required the examination of a long account, the reference was proper. Tay. Stats., 1499, § 25; R. S., 761,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. ShepardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. County Board of Supervisors v. DunningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Gilbank v. StephensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Monitor Iron Works Co. v. KetchumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Carpenter v. ShepardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Creve Coeur Lake Ice Co. v. TammSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Hewitt v. FollettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Cooper v. CleghornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Briggs v. HilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  5. United States Rolling Stock Co. v. JohnstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API