Legal Opinion
State v. Allen
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 20, 1967PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The defendant was charged, in an information filed by the state’s attorney, with the crime of having heroin, a narcotic drug, under her control in violation of § 19-246 of the General Stat- ntes. Before trial, she made a motion “that the evidence of narcotics obtained by the police on December 4, 1964, be suppressed by reason of the lack of existence of a proper search and seizure warrant”. The motion was not phrased, as it should have been, in the manner required by § 54-33f of the General Statutes. The statute clearly specifies the five reasons on which a motion to suppress may be grounded…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. ShifflettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. DeChamplainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. TowlesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- State v. FedericiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.