Legal Opinion
Nicastro v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1953No. 4603PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
The United States brought this action against Nicastro and Klotz under § 409(c) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 2109(c), 1 to recover damages and reasonable attorney’s fees for alleged violations of Ceiling Price Regulation 11, 2 16 F.R. p. 2391 et seq. 3 Nicastro and Klotz 4 operate the El Cabana Lounge in Salt Lake City, Utah. They opened the Lounge in 1942, occupying only a portion oí the building in which the Lounge was then located. Until August, 1951, they operated under a Class C beer license, selling beer, soft drinks, peanuts and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Gulf Refining Co. of La. v. NorvellSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Nabob Oil Co. v. United States. Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996
- Camunas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America and Ngpl-Trailblazer, Inc., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants v. Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd., and the Coastal Corporation, Counterclaim Midcon Ventures, Inc., CounterclaimantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Schuler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.