Legal Opinion

Seo v. Oh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 3, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2018-0785Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KANG KYU SEO, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 18-785 (RDM) v. CHARLES MOON SUK OH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. See Dkt. 64. Plaintiffs seek $314,662.40 in attorneys’ fees and $7,862.08 for costs. See Dkt. 69 at 4. For the reasons below, the Court will grant the motion. Moreover, because the governing D.C. law requires the Court to “use the rates in effect at the time the determination [of the fee award] is made,”

D.C. Code §…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API