S.O.U.P., Inc., a Corporation v. The Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Petitioner S.O.U.P., Inc., a corporation, has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the above entitled case. At the request of members of the Court, a financial statement of each of the small number of members of the corporation was filed. In light of the statute governing forma pauperis appeals, 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a), which we are bound to construe reasonably, assuming arguendo that a corporation may proceed in forma pauperis, we think it would be inconsistent with the congressional intent to hold that this corporation should be allowed to proceed in that manner in view of…
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie BandaccariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Carl Norman Quinn v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Move Organization v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.