Legal Opinion

Caudell v. Sargent

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1968No. 43918PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

The appellant enumerated as error two instructions given the jury in the court’s charge. However, it does not appear in the record that any objection was made to the charge before verdict as required by Code Ann. § 70-207 (a,b) (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 31; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493, 498; Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1078) and the enumerations of error are not considered. Nathan v. Duncan, 113 Ga. App. 630 (6) (149 SE2d 383). The appellant admits that no objection was made after the charge but insists that on a hearing concerning requests to charge, the appellant “vigorously” objected to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Atlanta Americana Motor Hotel Corp. v. Sika Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'brien's Irish Pub, Inc. v. Gerlew Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Hurst v. J. P. Colley Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Department of Transportation v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Sims v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. MacK v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API