Legal Opinion
Noble v. Plouf
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided July 11, 1923No. 23769PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The issues of these three suits being identical, except as to the defendants and the land involved, they were consolidated for the purpose of trial and appeal. This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment maintaining an exception of no cause of action in each suit.
The petition in each case alleges that on or about October 7, 1917, Mrs. Addie C. Pitts, Mrs. Nettie O. .Hampton, Mrs. Mary J. Plouf, Mrs. Eva G. Powell, and Mrs. Mary Agnew (the last three parties being represented by Mrs. Hampton as agent) executed in favor of Thomas Ward an oil lease on land in the parish of Caddo, and that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanby v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Riva's Heirs v. BernardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
- Whelage v. LotzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
- Keary v. DucoteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. GlassellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Di Cristina v. WeiserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Saint Denis Securities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Daigle & Associates, Inc. v. ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Krupp v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.